Wednesday, 4 November 2015

NDE AND OBE: Are they just hallucinations?

Near-death experiences (NDEs) are profound spiritual or mystical experiences that many people report as they approach or start to cross the threshold of death. The contents and after-effects of NDEs suggest that they are more than just hallucinations. The contents do not appear to be influenced by past religious beliefs, but do have a profound effect on religious or spiritual beliefs after the experience. Near-death experiencers (NDErs) also report a consistent positive change in attitude toward the transition from life to death. There is still no accepted scientific cause for NDEs. Each near-death experience is unique, but as a group NDEs display common features.
 Intense emotions: commonly of profound peace, well-being, love; others marked by fear, horror, loss
A perception of seeing one's body from above (called an out-of-body experience, or OBE), sometimes watching medical resuscitation efforts or moving instantaneously to other places
Rapid movement through darkness, often toward an indescribable light
A sense of being "somewhere else," in a landscape that may seem like a spiritual realm or world
Incredibly rapid, sharp thinking and observations
Encounter with deceased loved ones, possibly sacred figures  or unrecognized beings, with whom communication is mind-to-mind; these figures may seem consoling, loving, or terrifying
A life review, reliving actions and feeling their emotional impact on others
In some cases, a flood of knowledge about life and the nature of the universe.



If one examines the medical literature in the last two decades, the most common theories for the occurrence of NDEs have involved either a hallucination brought about by physiological changes during the dying process, or a psychological stress reaction to the perceived threat of death. For many years these two theories have formed the basis of possible scientific explanations. Many brain mediators have been proposed to account for the experiences, although none has yet been shown to be responsible for the phenomenon. These include release of endorphins; the body's own morphine-like substance, lack of brain oxygen, increased carbon dioxide, various drugs and in particular those that can cause hallucinations such as ketamine and temporal lobe seizures. The argument in favour of a psychological explanation has been based largely on observations made from retrospective cases indicating that near death experiences may sometimes occur in those who were not yet physically close to death at the time of the experience - such as in those occurring just before an accident.
Cardiac arrest patients are a subgroup of people who come closest to death. In such a situation an individual initially develops two out of three criteria (the absence of spontaneous breathing and heartbeat) of clinical death. Shortly afterwards (within seconds) these are followed by the third, which occurs due to the loss of activity of the areas of the brain responsible for sustaining life (brainstem) and thought processes (cerebral cortex). Brain monitoring using EEG in animals and humans has also demonstrated that the brain ceases to function at that time. During a cardiac arrest, the blood pressure drops almost immediately to unrecordable levels and at the same time, due to a lack of blood flow, the brain stops functioning as seen by flat brain waves (isoelectric line) on the monitor within around 10 seconds. This then remains the case throughout the time when the heart is given 'electric shock' therapy or when drugs such as adrenaline are given until the heartbeat is finally restored and the patient is resuscitated. Due to the lack of brain function in these circumstances, therefore, one would not expect there to be any lucid, well-structured thought processes, with reasoning and memory formation, which are characteristic of NDEs. Nevertheless, and contrary to what we would expect scientifically, studies have shown that 'near death experiences' do occur in such situations. This therefore raises a question of how such lucid and well-structured thought processes, together with such clear and vivid memories, occur in individuals who have little or no brain function. In other words, it would appear that the mind is seen to continue in a clinical setting in which there is little or no brain function. In particular, there have been reports of people being able to 'see' details from the events that occurred during their cardiac arrest, such as their dentures being removed.
In a study of 344 patients who survived cardiac arrest , all the reported elements of a Near-Death Experience (NDE) like an out-of-body perception, meeting with deceased relatives or a life review were experienced during a transient functional loss of the cortex and of the brainstem, with a flat line EEG. During their cardiac arrest people can have veridical perceptions from a position outside and above their lifeless body. NDE-ers have the feeling that they have apparently taken off their body like an old coat and to their surprise they appear to have retained their own identity with the possibility of perception, emotions, and a very clear consciousness. This out-of-body experience (OBE) is scientifically important because doctors, nurses, and relatives can verify the reported perceptions, and they can also corroborate the precise moment the NDE with OBE occurred during the period of CPR. This proves that an OBE cannot be a hallucination, because this means experiencing a perception that has no basis in “reality”, like in psychosis, neither it can be a delusion, which is an incorrect assessment of a correct perception, nor an illusion, which means a misleading image. Moreover, one needs a functioning brain for experiencing hallucinations, delusions or illusions. Additionally, even people blind from birth have reported veridical perceptions during NDE and OBE. Based on several NDE-studies it seems inevitable to conclude that veridical perception is possible independently of brain function.
Science, until very recently, has not taken seriously the huge amount of material gathered over the past hundred or so years by institutions devoted to recording non-ordinary experiences (near-death experiences) as well as communications to the living from the 'dead.' Nor has it accepted as worthy of scientific attention the experience of visionaries and mystics of all cultures and time that has testified to the existence of that other dimension of reality and the possibility of a direct relationship with it.



Friday, 16 October 2015

Enigmatic Electrons

The Quantum world is very different from the classical world. We all know that Quantum mechanics works well in practice, providing a highly precise means of interpreting the behaviour of subatomic particles, something that classical physics — the physics deduced by Sir Isaac Newton and others, fails to do so. Initially electrons were believed to be particles. But then there was evidence that they behaved like waves in phenomena such as electron diffraction. And so there was a growing confusion about the nature of subatomic particles. Were they wave like or particle like? And this confusion did not get resolved until the mid '20s when the laws of quantum mechanics were discovered, which actually showed that atomic particles are neither waves nor particles. They behave in their own strange quantum mechanical way.

But the Quantum Physics is really hard to comprehend and it has some of its own mysteries. A good example of this is the behaviour of electrons in the Double-slit Experiment. 


When macroscale objects such as bullets are shot at a barrier with two slits, with a wall behind the slits, the objects travel straight through the slits and hit the wall in one particular area. But when electrons(or light consisting of photons) are fired instead of macroscale objects, they do not hit the wall at one particular area , but hit the wall at a number of different points at the same time with different strength causing an interference pattern of many lines. The really amazing part is that unlike sound waves or water waves, the interference pattern is still produced when electrons are fired one at a time. Because the interference pattern remains even when the electrons are shot one at a time, the experiment seems to suggest that each electron somehow travels through both slits at the same time and interferes with itself. Mind-boggling? Yet true!



The second unusual part of the Double-slit experiment is that the electrons stop creating an interference pattern when scientists set up a detector near one of the slits to determine which slit(s) an electron is passing through. Under these circumstances, the electrons simply create two straight lines, the same as classical particles, as if they know everything that is going around.
Scientists ran the same experiment with polarising filters in front of each of the two slits. Any photon going one way would become "labelled" with left-handed circular polarization, while any photon going through the other slit is labelled with right-handed circular polarization. In this version of the experiment, it is possible in principle to tell which slit any particular photon arriving at the second screen went through. Surprising enough, the interference pattern vanishes -- even though nobody ever actually looks to see which photon went through which slit.

Now came a new trick -- the eraser. A third polarising filter was placed between the two slits and the second screen, to scramble up (or erase) the information about which photon went through which hole. Now, once again, it is impossible to tell which path any particular photon arriving at the second screen took through the experiment. Now, the interference pattern reappears.

The strange thing is that interference depends on "single photons" going through both slits "at once", but undetected. So how does a single photon arriving at the first screen know how it ought to behave in order to match the presence or absence of the erasing filter on the other side of the slits?


So how  does the electron come to know that it is being detected? There was a substantial chance that the electron was detected at this particular point. So now we would say to ourselves, if the electron went through slit 1, how could it possibly matter to it whether slit 2 was open or not? And if it did not matter to it, how could it be that the probability of detection of that electron went down from a substantial value to being very close to zero?

I rummaged the internet about the reason for such behaviour of electrons, I found certain theories explaining this but full of paradox and internal contradictions. In reality it has been baffling physicists and is still inexplicable.
Nobel Prize winner Physicist Richard Feynman also said, "i can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Do not keep saying to yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, ‘But how can it possibly be like that?’ because you will go down the drain into a blind alley from which nobody has yet escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that." (The Character of Physical Law, BBC Publications, 1965).

If we want to describe what happens in an atomic event, we have to realize that the word “happens” can only apply to the observation, not to the state of affairs between two observations.”
Heisenberg




Monday, 5 October 2015

TRANSCEND BEYOND YOUR GENDER


 The Present world mostly consists of hedonistic generations grown on the lines of consumerism. The 'Body' has become dominant and people are competing with each other to come closer and closer to the market-induced definition of "Beauty" whose transient nature is often forgotten. Directly or Indirectly, Knowingly or unknowingly, we are spending most time on our Gender identification, neglecting our mental and spiritual capabilities. We flaunt our distinguishing manly or womanly assets and be presentable to the opposite sex and to the world. We accentuate our bodily attributes whichever we feel suffices to be called "beautiful" by the worldly eyes and has potential to gain admiration.
In this berserk race, we have forgotten that we are human beings first, we are a spiritual body foremost and not a physical one. Body is just a temporary physical manifestation and abode of the soul. It is just an outer cover for identification.We all bleed the same.God made us different in terms of colour, height or other physical attribute so that we could be recognised among each other and God imparted Gender Division just for continuation of species and natural division of labour, not to get obsessed with it. There are only certain moments in our life when our gender roles and identification become necessary. You do not have to wear your sex on your sleeves all the time. The small physiological difference was necessary to efficiently run the cycle of life. But we have made this difference so wide, just in our minds. Our cultures have become such that there is excessive polarization of femininity and masculinity both in terms of physical attributes and internal traits. These are promoted as extreme, limited and rigid stereotypes rather than all-encompassing aspects of human potential. If you identify yourself with few distinguishing body parts, you perceive everything that way, you look everything around by that attitude and in turn you get treated that way. In reality, masculinity and femininity are interrelated aspects of one thing in continuum.
Break the shackles of gender-obsession if you want to be 'free'. Your Gender and sexuality is needed only when there are specific natural gender roles. Rest of the time, you are neither a man nor a woman, you are a soul, you are an energy. Physical body is not the ultimate boundary, Death is not the ultimate end. There is something beyond the physiological life process that is keeping you alive. To grow beyond the physical, you first need to grow beyond the gender.

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

Mathematical Trademark Of Nature



Mathematics is the language with which god has written the universe-GALILEO

Nature and its creator have always amazed us with their absolute perfection. The more we explore the more mysteries we discover, some beyond our level of wisdom or comprehension. Nothing in the meticulous patterns of nature is vague unless deciphered. It is very interesting to know that the peerless beauty of nature involves much mathematics. One of the mathematical pattern that governs a wide range of patterns observed in nature is the Fabonacci series and the Golden Ratio. It is a pattern that exists all around us but we do not notice it.

GOLDEN RATIO:
The golden ratio (symbol is the Greek letter "phi" shown at left) is a special irrational number approximately equal to 1.618.

We find the golden ratio when we divide a line into two parts so that the longer part divided by the smaller part is also equal to the whole length divided by the longer part.A golden rectangle is a rectangle whose side lengths are in the golden ratio, approximately 1:1.618.
A golden rectangle with longer side a and shorter side b, when placed adjacent to a square with sides of length a, will produce a similar golden rectangle

FIBONACCI SERIES:
The Fibonacci sequence starts like this: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55 and so on forever. Each number is the sum of the two numbers that precede it.When we takeany two successive (one after the other) Fibonacci Numbers, their ratio is very close to the Golden Ratio which has the value of 1.618 after being rounded off.


The ubiquity and astounding functionality of the Fibonacci Series and the Golden Ratio  has captivated mathematicians, artists, designers,architecture,photographers and scientists for centuries.
The Golden ratio and Fibonacci series is visually striking in many forms of nature from the leaf arrangement in plants, to the pattern of the florets of a flower, the bracts of a pinecone, or the scales of a pineapple flower petals, seed heads, tree branches, shells, bodies of many creatures, human body, human face, fingers, teeth, and even DNA molecules , hurricanes and Spiral Galaxies.
Watch these videos and you would know why it is no exaggeration to call the Golden Ratio as'Divine Ratio'.

So what is the Golden Ratio Point of our Earth? i rummaged through the internet, verified from multiple sources and the answer awed me. It is the city of Mecca. Watch this