The Quantum
world is very different from the classical world. We all know that Quantum
mechanics works well in practice, providing a highly precise means of
interpreting the behaviour of subatomic particles, something that classical
physics — the physics deduced by Sir Isaac Newton and others, fails to do so. Initially
electrons were believed to be particles. But then there was evidence that they
behaved like waves in phenomena such as electron diffraction. And so there was
a growing confusion about the nature of subatomic particles. Were they wave
like or particle like? And this confusion did not get resolved until the mid
'20s when the laws of quantum mechanics were discovered, which actually showed
that atomic particles are neither waves
nor particles. They behave in their own strange quantum mechanical way.
But the
Quantum Physics is really hard to comprehend and it has some of its own
mysteries. A good example of this is the behaviour of
electrons in the Double-slit Experiment.
When macroscale objects such as
bullets are shot at a barrier with two slits, with a wall behind the slits, the
objects travel straight through the slits and hit the wall in one particular
area. But when electrons(or light consisting of photons) are fired instead of
macroscale objects, they do not hit the wall at one particular area , but hit
the wall at a number of different points at the same time with different
strength causing an interference pattern of many lines. The really amazing part
is that unlike sound waves or water waves, the
interference pattern is still produced when electrons are fired one at a time.
Because the interference pattern remains even when the electrons are shot one
at a time, the experiment seems to suggest that each electron somehow travels through both slits at the same time and
interferes with itself. Mind-boggling? Yet true!
The second
unusual part of the Double-slit experiment is that the electrons stop creating an interference pattern when scientists set up
a detector near one of the slits to determine which slit(s) an electron is
passing through. Under these circumstances, the electrons simply create two
straight lines, the same as classical particles, as if they know everything
that is going around.
Scientists ran
the same experiment with polarising filters in front of each of the two slits.
Any photon going one way would become "labelled" with left-handed
circular polarization, while any photon going through the other slit is
labelled with right-handed circular polarization. In this version of the
experiment, it is possible in principle to tell which slit any particular
photon arriving at the second screen went through. Surprising enough, the interference pattern vanishes -- even though
nobody ever actually looks to see which photon went through which slit.
Now came a
new trick -- the eraser. A third polarising filter was placed between the two
slits and the second screen, to scramble up (or erase) the information about
which photon went through which hole. Now, once again, it is impossible to tell
which path any particular photon arriving at the second screen took through the
experiment. Now, the interference pattern
reappears.
The strange
thing is that interference depends on "single photons" going through
both slits "at once", but undetected. So how
does a single photon arriving at the first screen know how it ought to behave
in order to match the presence or absence of the erasing filter on the other
side of the slits?
So how does the electron come to know that it is
being detected? There was a substantial chance that the electron was detected
at this particular point. So now we would say to ourselves, if the electron
went through slit 1, how could it possibly matter to it whether slit 2 was open
or not? And if it did not matter to it, how could it be that the probability of
detection of that electron went down from a substantial value to being very
close to zero?
I rummaged
the internet about the reason for such behaviour of electrons, I found certain
theories explaining this but full of paradox and internal contradictions. In
reality it has been baffling physicists and is still inexplicable.
Nobel Prize
winner Physicist Richard Feynman also said, "i can
safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics. Do not keep saying to
yourself, if you can possibly avoid it, ‘But how can it possibly be like that?’
because you will go down the drain into a blind alley from which nobody has yet
escaped. Nobody knows how it can be like that." (The Character of
Physical Law, BBC Publications, 1965).
“If we want to describe what happens in an atomic event, we
have to realize that the word “happens” can only apply to the observation, not
to the state of affairs between two observations.”
Heisenberg